Re: Recommended antenna for Buffalo WBR2-G54
Kevin Purcell <[email protected]> Wed, 3 Dec 2008 18:02:06 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.wireless.seattle.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I'm less worried about the technical regs that the unwanted third (and higher) order IMD you get out of the PA when you overdrive it splattering across the band. Just because you can turn the knob up to 11 doesn't mean it's a good idea (and unless you can verify you are not splattering with a spectrum analyzer it isn't a good idea). In addition to splattering across adjacent WiFi channels that splatter will raise the noise floor for hams using the band at the bottom end - particularly for narrow band work (ham sats in particular). These guys are operating in weak signal mode very close to the noise floor. Remember (unless you are IDing as a ham) this is Part 15 (no interference to other services!). The other side of this argument is a decent directional antenna is it works both ways: the extra few dB helps the path in both TX and RX which is probably what you want as this is an access point not a beacon. No point being an "alligator" (all mouth and no ears) as the CBers used to say. Kevin N7WIM On Dec 3, 2008, at 5:12 PM, Gary wrote: > > otoh, FH and DSS gear may be limited to 100 mW. I see a lot of 300 mW > gear, though. Hrm... > > On 12/3/08, Kevin Purcell <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Dec 3, 2008, at 4:25 PM, Gary wrote: >> >>> How about installing DD-WRT on it? That way you can boost the output >>> power without investing in any antenna hardware -- then if you >>> add an >>> antenna it'll be even better. >> >> Better in the sense that it will splatter all over the band >> (including the amateur part of the band down at channel 1). They keep >> the power down to meet FCC spurious signal requirements. >> >> Keep the power as low as you can manage. There is only a finite >> amount of frequency space so keeping your cell as small as possible >> helps. >> >> Using an better (directive) antenna is a much cleaner solution. >> >> 73 DE N7WIM >> -- >> Kevin Purcell >> [email protected] >> >> >> >>> >> > > > -- Kevin Purcell [email protected] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the SeattleWireless Talk list, hosted by Google Groups To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/swn-talk?hl=en For more about the SeattleWireless.NET project, see http://seattlewireless.net/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---