Re: Recommended antenna for Buffalo WBR2-G54

Gary <[email protected]> Wed, 3 Dec 2008 17:12:47 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.network.wireless.seattle.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
otoh, FH and DSS gear may be limited to 100 mW. I see a lot of 300 mW
gear, though. Hrm...

On 12/3/08, Kevin Purcell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 3, 2008, at 4:25 PM, Gary wrote:
>
>> How about installing DD-WRT on it? That way you can boost the output
>> power without investing in any antenna hardware -- then if you add an
>> antenna it'll be even better.
>
> Better in the sense that it will splatter all over the band
> (including the amateur part of the band down at channel 1). They keep
> the power down to meet FCC spurious signal requirements.
>
> Keep the power as low as you can manage. There is only a finite
> amount of frequency space so keeping your cell as small as possible
> helps.
>
> Using an better (directive) antenna is a much cleaner solution.
>
> 73 DE N7WIM
> --
> Kevin Purcell
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the SeattleWireless Talk list, hosted by Google Groups
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/swn-talk?hl=en

For more about the SeattleWireless.NET project, see http://seattlewireless.net/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---