Re: Recommended antenna for Buffalo WBR2-G54
Gary <[email protected]> Wed, 3 Dec 2008 17:12:47 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.wireless.seattle.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
otoh, FH and DSS gear may be limited to 100 mW. I see a lot of 300 mW gear, though. Hrm... On 12/3/08, Kevin Purcell <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Dec 3, 2008, at 4:25 PM, Gary wrote: > >> How about installing DD-WRT on it? That way you can boost the output >> power without investing in any antenna hardware -- then if you add an >> antenna it'll be even better. > > Better in the sense that it will splatter all over the band > (including the amateur part of the band down at channel 1). They keep > the power down to meet FCC spurious signal requirements. > > Keep the power as low as you can manage. There is only a finite > amount of frequency space so keeping your cell as small as possible > helps. > > Using an better (directive) antenna is a much cleaner solution. > > 73 DE N7WIM > -- > Kevin Purcell > [email protected] > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the SeattleWireless Talk list, hosted by Google Groups To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/swn-talk?hl=en For more about the SeattleWireless.NET project, see http://seattlewireless.net/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---