Re: Développement sous accord de non di vulgation de code GPL

Le mardi 27 avril 2010 09:41, Jean-Marie Gouarn=E9 a =E9crit :
>Il me semble que la premi=E8re question qui se pose est "La GPL est-elle
>bien adapt=E9e =E0 cette situation ?".

Pourquoi pas ?

Le cas est pr=E9vu dans la FAQ de la GPL. (You can also release your=20
changes to the client under the GPL, but agree not to release them to=20
anyone else...)

http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#DoesTheGPLAllowNDA

    Does the GPL allow me to develop a modified version under a
    nondisclosure agreement?

    Yes. For instance, you can accept a contract to develop changes
    and agree not to release your changes until the client says ok.
    This is permitted because in this case no GPL-covered code is
    being distributed under an NDA.
    You can also release your changes to the client under the GPL, but
    agree not to release them to anyone else unless the client says
    ok. In this case, too, no GPL-covered code is being distributed
    under an NDA, or under any additional restrictions.
    The GPL would give the client the right to redistribute your
    version. In this scenario, the client will probably choose not to
    exercise that right, but does have the right.

>Pourquoi ne pas =E9crire une licence qui reprenne les id=E9es de la GPL
> sur certains points
>mais qui inclue explicitement la clause de non-divulgation ?

Ce ne serait plus une licence copyleft=E9e, donc pas compatible GPL. Non ?

Salutations,

--=20
Erwan HAMON - http://hamon.erwan.free.fr/
              http://ffii.fr/ http://aful.org/ http://rotomalug.org/

--=20
Gerez vos abonnements aux listes de diffusion : https://www.aful.org/wws

Ce message n'engage que son auteur et ne reflete pas la position officielle
de l'AFUL ; pour celle-ci consultez http://www.aful.org/