Re: [hm-staff] Re: The list of current Issues in IPv6 Policy

Randy and all,

  Someday I hope that the IETF will renew it's once very good
cooperation with the now much lager and more diverse
Stakeholder/user community.

But of course I am one of those fellows that believes that
hope springs eternal...

  But after the verio fiasco, one has to at least wonder...

Randy Bush wrote:

> > It is clear from the policy criteria that the policy was meant for the
> > RIRs to only provide /32 to transit providers.  No discussion was done
> > about private networks as the RFC 1918 concept was not to apply.  It
> > would appear to me that there needs to be a policy proposal to address
> > the private network issue in which globally unique private addresses are
> > required for networks using IPv6.
>
> yep.  and it would be wise to coordinate this with ietf work in this
> space.  kinda like we used to do when the internet was still a
> cooperative place.
>
> randy
>
> _______________________________________________
> global-v6 mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 131k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
    Pierre Abelard
===============================================================
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [email protected]
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801


_______________________________________________
global-v6 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6