Re: The list of current Issues in IPv6 Policy
German Valdez <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.apnic.global-v6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 08:04 AM 9/25/2003, Izumi Okutani wrote: > >I'm wondering how we can proceed from here. Is it just a matter of >confirming the actual situation with the RIRs, or do we need another >process to confirm the interpretation? > >In anycase, I am interested to know how the RIRs deal with such >requests(allocation for closed networks) under the current >policy. Could I request the RIRs to share it in the ML? > > >Izumi > LACNIC doesn't allocate IPv6 addresses for "private 'closed' networks.". In fact, the IPv6 working groups is considering to include one possible additional condition in the current policies. The condition would be that the IPv6 would be announced in the Internet in less a given time. German Valdez Policy Liaison LACNIC >_______________________________________________ >global-v6 mailing list >[email protected] >http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6 _______________________________________________ global-v6 mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6