Re: IPv6 Policy Proposal for LACNIC Region
Gert Doering <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.apnic.global-v6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 11:40:26PM +0900, Kosuke Ito wrote:
> There are many countries having the similar situation like yours
> in APNIC region as well, I believe. If LACNIC allows to put off
> this specific condition, then, many of ISPs who has not had an
> IPv6 allocation yet in APNIC likes to have the same one in
> APNIC. Many of ISPs even in Japan may welcome to have it, too.
> Maybe same in RIPE-NCC, and in ARIN.
The 200-user limit has not really been a problem in the RIPE region.
ISPs that are serious about providing IPv6 usually have 200 customers,
and are willing to offer all of them IPv6 services.
People need to understand that, as of today, *nobody* can be *sure*
to have 200 IPv6-enabled customers in 2 years. If the customers have
no interest, there won't be any.
The key item is "have the *intention* to provide services to 200 (or more)
customers".
Being overly restrictive in the IPv6 allocation policy is a bad signal -
there is enough address space, and the global routing table will easily
cope with 2000 prefixes per region - we should try to make people
*accept* IPv6, not hinder its deployment based on some unreasonable
fears.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 58081 (57882)
SpaceNet AG Mail: [email protected]
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
_______________________________________________
global-v6 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6