Re: IPv6 Policy Proposal for LACNIC Region

Gert and all,

 Good points below in your comments and/or remarks, Gert.
Indeed basing any policy on fear is a very poor and unreasonable
approach.  It is also very clear in my mind that you are correct
as well that a minimum allocation policy that is based on
a subjective is and therefore when a requested to a regions
RIR that is subject to that RIR's judgment of a *intention*
to provide services to 200 (or more) from a service provider
for it's potential customers, will likely lead to real problems
of a political and in some instances a personal nature regarding
approval or lack there of.  Hence leading to likely unwarranted
damage that will wind up in a legal action or expensive, protracted
litigation.


Gert Doering wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 11:40:26PM +0900, Kosuke Ito wrote:
> > There are many countries having the similar situation like yours
> > in APNIC region as well, I believe. If LACNIC allows to put off
> > this specific condition, then, many of ISPs who has not had an
> > IPv6 allocation yet in APNIC likes to have the same one in
> > APNIC. Many of ISPs even in Japan may welcome to have it, too.
> > Maybe same in RIPE-NCC, and in ARIN.
>
> The 200-user limit has not really been a problem in the RIPE region.
>
> ISPs that are serious about providing IPv6 usually have 200 customers,
> and are willing to offer all of them IPv6 services.
>
> People need to understand that, as of today, *nobody* can be *sure*
> to have 200 IPv6-enabled customers in 2 years.  If the customers have
> no interest, there won't be any.
>
> The key item is "have the *intention* to provide services to 200 (or more)
> customers".
>
> Being overly restrictive in the IPv6 allocation policy is a bad signal -
> there is enough address space, and the global routing table will easily
> cope with 2000 prefixes per region - we should try to make people
> *accept* IPv6, not hinder its deployment based on some unreasonable
> fears.
>
> Gert Doering
>         -- NetMaster
> --
> Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  58081  (57882)
>
> SpaceNet AG                 Mail: [email protected]
> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14   Tel : +49-89-32356-0
> 80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-299

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
    Pierre Abelard

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [email protected]
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801


_______________________________________________
global-v6 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6