Re: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-narten-ipv6-3177bis-48boundary-00.txt
David Conrad <[email protected]> Tue, 19 Jul 2005 10:46:35 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.apnic.global-v6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Jul 19, 2005, at 10:28 AM, Thomas Narten wrote: > And to be clear, I don't believe anyone is proposing this. I.e., going > from a /56 to a /48 would require renumbering, most likely. I think it'd be appropriate to do the binary split sparse allocation approach, but that's an implementation decision. Given IPv6 technology right now, I think it would be prudent to reduce the cost of renumbering if possible. Rgds, -drc _______________________________________________ global-v6 mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6