Re: PI space under IPv6

David Meyer <[email protected]> Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:52:20 -0800

Newsgroups	gmane.org.apnic.global-v6
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 05:47:57PM +0000, Paul Vixie wrote:
> > > People don't (usually) call today's IPv4 PI space "the swamp" either -
> > > that's reserved for, well, the 192 swamp...
> > 
> > 	Right, and that (the 192...) is analogous to what is being built for
> > 	IPv6 as we speak. The salient point is that it (PI space) has the
> > 	potential to be/is unaggregatable space.
> 
> aggregatability only matters to the owners and operators of the core.
> provider independence only matters to the owners and operators of the edge.
> this is classic us-vs-them economics.  and this thread is a classic lead-in
> to the "EID vs. RID" re-debate.  

	Yep, well said.

> is that online anywhere, so that we can point newcomers to it,
> rather than re-debating it every few months forever? 

	Excellent suggestion.

	--dmm

_______________________________________________
global-v6 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/global-v6

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFrqikORgD1qCZ2KcRAvqmAJ97FbfkCHhJl6fANFVFCdfNlUr3lQCfQN3w
0/E3JYraz9CA18AsmGwRlNI=
=3JKQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----