Re: wiki

excellent.  i'm out for the weekend.  thanks for hooking that up.  
another idea i had was to put some crap in the string that is only 
viewable by machines.  ie..

2< span class=hidden>3238<span>5<div class=hidden>3</div>0

entering 250 would get a success to edit.  that is... if we have 
troubles with the current approach.  i have a feeling it is going to 
work.  i'm interested to trace down who is fuckin wiht us on this.  i'd 
like to see their business collapse.

-j

Aaron S. Hawley wrote:

>I've added actual PHP code to verify the little "Put something in the box"
>so the submission doesn't work unles they have. I think it seems to
>actually work as intended.
>
>But, I'm going to change it by requiring a random number be entered by the
>user to the box.  That should fool the Wiki spam bots and is being used by
>the WikiWikiWeb at c2.com.
>
>BH Wiki trolls should scream if I've broken something.
>/a
>
>On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Jon S wrote:
>
>  
>
>>robots.txt is in for now.  at least now i don't feel bad about the link
>>profiting.  *time to go back through and clean up again*...
>>
>>Jon S wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>so over the past couple of weeks i have been fixing the wiki every
>>>other day pretty much.  i continue to deny IPs but something is
>>>obviously attacking our wiki.  fuckni sucks, so i am going to look
>>>into some human interface stuff (those images that make you verify the
>>>word) and see if i can get that implemented to allow confirmation.
>>>sucks, any other ideas?
>>>      
>>>
>_______________________________________________
>devel mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://your.ballistichelmet.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>  
>