RE: Barack Obama
"Vicki Mercer" <[email protected]> Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:01:31 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.ballistichelmet.heads |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <000001c475af$3960fa80$0b0110ac@cocos> |
It's nonsensical to suggest that Camejo should speak at the Democratic convention. I guess you think Cheney should be there too. Also, millions of people don't have Obama's speaking talents and skills, which are extremely rare. I saw Camejo debate during the California recall election, and he sure as hell couldn't run circles around him. Ask David who? Does he have better credentials than Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton? These guys don't toe the party line (and never have), but I don't see them hoping to destroy it. I think you give yourself too much credit. The Dems aren't depressed, and I imagine that ticks you off to no end. Looks like your man Bush is going down, no matter how hard you work on his behalf. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam Miller Sent: July 29, 2004 5:30 AM To: 'list for the ballistic helmet heads' Subject: RE: [ballistichelmet] Barack Obama To claim that his name has anything to do with his keynote and reception is utter bullshit. Clearly, he's an extremely talented man who is able to craft and deliver a hell of a speech and touch and energize people profoundly. He has the fundamental skills needed to help improve the Democratic party. But it doesn't sound as if you want it to improve. Methinks you simply want it to be destroyed. Look, I'm not saying that he's not a good speaker. I did say I think he is a very good speaker, in fact. So is Peter Camejo. Actually, I'm sure Camejo could run circles around the guy. Regardless, you don't see Peter Camejo being invited to speak, although he would pretty efficiently bring in much of the far left to at least watch were that the case: The reason is, he does not toe the party line. What I'm pointing out is not cynical about this man's talents (any more than anyone should be of a STATE SENATOR who has NEVER HELD FEDERAL OFFICE beying the KEYNOTE SPEAKER at the NATIONAL CONVENTION), but cynical about the Democratic Parties use of his image, which, in a text-based society, is at least partially based in one's name. Barack Obama does not sound like a 6'3", 285 white dude in a tractor hat and overalls. He does not sound white. His name immediately brings a mental picture to mind of a black man. THIS IS NOT A BAD THING. What I am saying is that I heard this man's name mentioned a lot more than I did ex-candidate Al Gore's on the day that he was to speak, and more than even Clinton, the last guy Dems have put up to run with any semblance of a personality (oh yeah, and a 2-termer). THEY HYPED HIM - Which is actually a pretty blatant insult, if you ask me - and USED him for his name. Now, like I said, the guy belonged there based on his talents. So did a million other people, I'm sure. The DNC, which no longer serves any purpose other than PR - see the demonstration space picture that David sent around if you think issues are being raised there - is about bringing out the people you want to represent the face of your party, people that will attract the target demographic. Barack Obama did nothing wrong by speaking at this engagement, but the Democratic Party is not about equality, it's about protecting their interests. Sorry if it's not sunshine and roses, but realism starts to look a lot like cynicism if you only get your news from the party line. It is very much in their interest to court black voters, as it's typically a Democratic-voting group. With Bush's NAACP snub and the importance being placed on Florida (notice the rapidly increasing amount of noise being made about last election's debacle - where was this 4 years ago?), locking up the black vote in at least one VERY key state could very well turn the tide. So what do you do? You take stock of the available resources for accomplishing this task, and you take the one with the chance to make the biggest impact and make it your centerpiece. That's what the Democratic Party reduced him to, and Obama most likely had an understanding of this. He's aiming high - good for him - but he's aiming high in the DEMOCRATIC PARTY BEURACRACY, which, while being a wonderful boon to their corporate sponsors, is not a good model of how to best help the American people: If you don't believe me, just ask David. Frankly, your cynicism is depressing and counterproductive. If you don't believe me, just ask Jesse. Always glad to depress and be counterproductive to the Dems - A(m) _______________________________________________ heads mailing list [email protected] http://ballistichelmet.org/mailman/listinfo/heads/ http://ballistichelmet.org/donate/