Re: Nader, Scalia to speak at UVM
"Adam Miller" <[email protected]> Thu, 07 Oct 2004 08:27:24 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.ballistichelmet.heads |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Heads, can someone get access to this and tape it for me? I would lik= e=20 > to post a transcript of this somewhere, as well as a copy of the video=20 > in its entirety. Seems like this would be a way to get around the lack= =20 > of recording devices allowed. ?? ideas? I'm gonna be out of town, otherwise I'd be all over it. I do have one of = those mini-recorder things (like the ones in the movies where important p= eople record their thoughts on), but you'd need a pretty nice mic setup o= r be sitting right next to a speaker to get it with decent quality. My nu= mber is 860-1413 if anyone in town is gonna need it, just gimme a call to= night as we're leaving at the ass-crack of dawn tomorrow. > ps. how was ralph?=20 Ralph was great, although you'd never know it from the Free Press article= (surprise, surprise, a Gannett publication trash-talking Nader...): http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/bfpnews/news/wednesday/2000h.htm (I gotta put in the opening paragraph. I wonder which viewpoint the BFP t= akes on his campaign? I'm glad the press is so fucking neutral these days= ...) "Ralph Nader the spoiler, or the political straight arrow, depending on w= ho's offering the description, brought his quixotic presidential campaign= to Vermont on Tuesday night." Arggh...Well, anyway...Ralph was great, as I said before. Contrary to the= article, he was a very engaging speaker, refraining from the simplificat= ions and rhetoric that are the corporatist's stock and trade. He spoke ab= out the decline of the will of the government to stand up to insurance an= d medical companies by really pushing for socialized medicine. He raised = the point that that old socialist Dick Nixon's medical plan was actually = a whole lot more progressive than John Kerry's current one, which I thoug= ht was interesting. He spoke about the Democratic Party's willingness to = subvert the democratic process by tying up an economically disadvantaged = campaign in the courts in what the Dems have acknowledged are nothing mor= e than diversionary tactics. One thing that bothers me that he DIDN'T say= was that the Dems are sure litigious now that a "spoiler is threatening = to steal 'their' votes"...Where was that willingness to use the legal sys= tem when the Bush Junta stole the whole f ucking election? Anyway... He spoke about the Dems and Republicans having their three disparate issu= es (gun control, abortion, and something else - I know, I'm a moron, but = I just got up), but being on the same side of many others that affect us = much more deeply, e.g. free trade, Israel-Palestine, American globalism, = THE IRAQ WAR, blah blah blah...you guys know the list. He talked a lot ab= out the "least-worst" syndrome, where we as a society have been condition= ed to accept the least-worst candidate rather than the best, and that Ame= rica's youth should (and to a greater extent than our older counterparts,= DO) expect more.=20 There were some other good speakers, as well. One guy whose name I don't = remember, but Aaron does, I'm sure, was a medical preofessional who had g= iven a speech earlier that day regarding the state of Canada's social hea= lth system vs. America's, and he gave a quick summation opening the night= , which was great. Basically, Canada's a lot better off and more efficien= t than the American system, and much of the argumentation put forth again= st socialized medicine doesn't bear out under the facts and stats. Anthon= y Pollina also spoke, really well, might I add. Dude's got polish. Anyway= , he had a more local, state-size focus, and spoke about the attempt of l= ocal farmers to form their own co-op to stand up to the Dallas, TX-based = co-op that currently soaks up most of Vermont's dairy. Basically, the leg= islature approved it, but Jim Douglas vetoed it, but they're coming back = again with the same idea, and they need our support. Charlotte, do you kn= ow anything about this? You seem to be ou r resident Agro-commie...If anyone does, please give me a heads up as to= anything I might be able to do to help out.=20 All in all, it was a really good night. I broke out before the Q&A period= , as I generally despise the moronic questions people ask (yeah, I know, = I'm an asshole), so I didn't see it all, though. Aaron and David stuck ar= ound longer than me. Aaron also came in later than me, and evidently he s= aw some Kerry/Edwards folks outside. Thanks for coming, dickheads, we did= n't protest your candidate when he came to...oh yeah, KERRY COULD GIVE A = SHIT ABOUT VERMONT, AND NEVER CAME, AND NEVER WILL. We couldn't even get = a VP candidate's wife, the 2 of diamonds in the campaign PR deck.=20 OK, Gotta get to work.=20 -A(m) --=20 _______________________________________________ Find what you are looking for with the Lycos Yellow Pages http://r.lycos.com/r/yp_emailfooter/http://yellowpages.lycos.com/default.= asp?SRC=3Dlycos10 _______________________________________________ heads mailing list [email protected] http://your.ballistichelmet.org/mailman/listinfo/heads/ http://ballistichelmet.org/donate/