valley of peace?
graham lebel <grahamlebel-/[email protected]> Sat, 9 Oct 2004 12:19:10 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.ballistichelmet.heads |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
where is this valley of peace that bush speaks of? If there is a valley of peace then we can assume that there is war in the mountains, as mountains are the opposite of valleys and war of peace. this is odd, since one would assume that war would be fought in the valleys because, from a geographical standpoint, the valley is where population centers often are. what would be the point of fighting a war in the mountains, then? seems like a waste of money, but of course this is what bush has done in afghanistan. Nevertheless, if bush has seen the valley of peace in his delusional mind, we can assume that bush is a man of war. this is because it is impossible to 'see', or look down on a valley without being in the mountains. Now, if bush is spending his time in the mountains (where the war is being fought), we can assume that he is a hawk not a dove, as a dove would spend his/her time in the valley where peace is being waged (if peace can truly be 'waged' like war can). If a man of war is up in the mountains looking down at the valley of peace, we should all be filled with terror, as a man of war can only have the intent of destroying the valley of peace. anyway, this was really a rant, but i just wanted to point out that derrida is dead and no news outlet is reporting it. everytime a ramone dies we here about it, but derrida dies and we don't get shit. perhaps, because the ramones were reaganites? -g _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ heads mailing list [email protected] http://your.ballistichelmet.org/mailman/listinfo/heads/ http://ballistichelmet.org/donate/