valley of peace?

graham lebel <grahamlebel-/[email protected]> Sat, 9 Oct 2004 12:19:10 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups gmane.org.ballistichelmet.heads
Message-ID <[email protected]>
where is this valley of peace that bush speaks of?  If
there is a valley of peace then we can assume that
there is war in the mountains, as mountains are the
opposite of valleys and war of peace.  this is odd,
since one would assume that war would be fought in the
valleys because, from a geographical standpoint, the
valley is where population centers often are.  what
would be the point of fighting a war in the mountains,
then?  seems like a waste of money, but of course this
is what bush has done in afghanistan.  Nevertheless,
if bush has seen the valley of peace in his delusional
mind, we can assume that bush is a man of war.  this
is because it is impossible to 'see', or look down on
a valley without being in the mountains.  Now, if bush
is spending his time in the mountains (where the war
is being fought), we can assume that he is a hawk not
a dove, as a dove would spend his/her time in the
valley where peace is being waged (if peace can truly
be 'waged' like war can).  If a man of war is up in
the mountains looking down at the valley of peace, we
should all be filled with terror, as a man of war can
only have the intent of destroying the valley of
peace.

anyway, this was really a rant, but i just wanted to
point out that derrida is dead and no news outlet is
reporting it.  everytime a ramone dies we here about
it, but derrida dies and we don't get shit.  perhaps,
because the ramones were reaganites?

-g




		
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
heads mailing list
[email protected]
http://your.ballistichelmet.org/mailman/listinfo/heads/
http://ballistichelmet.org/donate/