Re: regarding list noise

On Wed, 2003-04-23 at 19:17, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> Seth's reposts were fascinating, but this *isn't* a complete unmoderated
> list, is it?  Perhaps I should clarify that I was responding in particular
> to this:

Sorry.  I switched the list to moderated, and then discovered that
mailman wasn't properly notifying me about posts.  So, I sent the
backlog through.  I should have checked more carefully, sorry.

Anyway, I set the list unmoderated (members-only).  I'll still bounce
off-topic messages that get moderated because they're cross-posts, or
because they're from non-members.  If there get to be too many messages
which I don't bounce, let me know and I'll try to take the list
moderated again.

> I assumed that dmca-activists was likewise closed to non-members (the norm
> due to spam, no?), and thus the presence of these messages in my
> mailbox meant that someone had explicitly moderated them through.  I was
> voicing my preference that this not be done in the future, except for
> directly-relevant announcements, minutes, etc.  Discussion IMO being best
> restricted to among list members, rather than among the world entire.
> 
> But perhaps I was wrong.  I suppose in that case I fall back on requesting
> the standard -announce/-discuss split, sigh.
> 
> Enough of out me, or the email about the noise will outshout the noise.
>  --scott
> 
> DES DNC counter-intelligence Khaddafi Diplomat Leitrim DC Kojarena 
> shortwave D5 SLBM explosives Yeltsin EZLN FBI algorithm Attache ammunition 
>                          ( http://cscott.net/ )
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DMCA-Activists mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dmca-activists
-- 
-Dave Turner
GPL Compliance Engineer
Support my work: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=novalis&p=FSF