Re: [Patents] The politics of software over-protection -- moving forward..
Hartmut Pilch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.dmca-activists |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> The Intellectual Property Policy Directorate (IPPD) of Industry Canada > doesn't appear to be listening to us yet, so discussing statutory > exceptions to software is not yet in the cards. I'd assume that they will not listen to you/us any time very soon, no matter what subject you/we want to raise with them. A group of swiss linux users published a petition to the Swiss Patent Office (ige.ch) in november 2000. They did not only get no answer. The result was that the Swiss delegation (consisting of ige.ch people) at the Diplomatic Conference of November 2000 vehemently demanded deletion of the exclusion of software patents from Art 52(2), while all the others followed the position of the DE-EN-FR governments, which was to leave Art 52(2) as is and solve their problems via a EU directive instead. This is probably, also in Canada, the likely outcome of focussing your efforts on patent offices. -- Hartmut Pilch, FFII & Eurolinux Alliance tel. +49-89-12789608 Protecting Innovation against Patent Inflation http://swpat.ffii.org/ 140,000 signatures against software patents http://noepatents.org/