Re: "Offene Standards": Koalition beharrt auf Umdefinition
"Martin Schröder" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.fitug.debate |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 22.06.07 schrieb Florian Weimer <[email protected]>: > Ich weiß nicht, wie weit die Forderungen gehen. Wäre das folgende > ausreichend? > > | In addition, for the Eifel submission, if said submission is included > | in an IETF standard and Ericsson has patents that are essential to the > | implementation of such included submission in said standard, Ericsson > | is prepared to grant - on the basis of reciprocity -a paid up, > | nonexclusive, royalty free license on such patents for the purpose of > | implementing said standard, if and only if practiced under any > | software distributed under the present terms of the GNU GENERAL PUBLIC > | LICENSE (http://www.fsf.org/copyleft/gpl.html) or practiced under any > | operating system software in which all major components of the > | operating system - including the kernel, device drivers and libraries > | necessary to run a program - are distributed under the terms of a > | license that conforms to the present OPEN SOURCE DEFINITION > | (http://www.opensource.org/osd.html). Nein. BSD kann damit nichts anfangen. Gruß Martin _______________________________________________ Debate mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fitug.de:8080/mailman/listinfo/debate