Re: "Offene Standards": Koalition beharrt auf Umdefinition
Florian Weimer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.fitug.debate |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
* Martin Schröder: > Am 22.06.07 schrieb Florian Weimer <[email protected]>: >> Ich weiß nicht, wie weit die Forderungen gehen. Wäre das folgende >> ausreichend? >> >> | In addition, for the Eifel submission, if said submission is included >> | in an IETF standard and Ericsson has patents that are essential to the >> | implementation of such included submission in said standard, Ericsson >> | is prepared to grant - on the basis of reciprocity -a paid up, >> | nonexclusive, royalty free license on such patents for the purpose of >> | implementing said standard, if and only if practiced under any >> | software distributed under the present terms of the GNU GENERAL PUBLIC >> | LICENSE (http://www.fsf.org/copyleft/gpl.html) or practiced under any >> | operating system software in which all major components of the >> | operating system - including the kernel, device drivers and libraries >> | necessary to run a program - are distributed under the terms of a >> | license that conforms to the present OPEN SOURCE DEFINITION >> | (http://www.opensource.org/osd.html). > > Nein. BSD kann damit nichts anfangen. Ach ja? Den GCC nehmen sie aber trotzdem gerne. _______________________________________________ Debate mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fitug.de:8080/mailman/listinfo/debate