Re: [URGENT) [proofread] [EN]

Ana Galan <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.fsf.europe.translators
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Richard,

thanks for your fast proofread.

Best,

Ana

On 9/10/24 21:55, Richard L. Schmeidler wrote:
> I am attaching versions of the xhtml from the two webpreviews that reflect my
> suggestions for improvements.
>
>
> For the press release, "The FSFE demands EU Commission sustainable
> long-term Free Software funding"
>
> 1.  "In the wake of the recent €27 million cut in the NGI funding, the
> Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) is responding to growing
> society concern by participating in a public consultation of the
> European Commission."  I suggest either omitting "society" or
> replacing "society concern" with "concern in society."  To say
> "society concern" seems to me to be strange English usage.  Omitting
> "society" solves the usage problem by omitting the rather vague
> assertion that society is concerned and leaving unstated who is
> concerned.  If you want to retain the idea that society is concerned,
> I suggest changing the word order.
>
> 2.  "Amidst the European Commission's unclear stance on future
> funding, the FSFE has participated in the public consultation pushing
> to ensure that Free Software solutions receive the necessary long-term
> funding."
>
> (a)  I suggest replacing "Amidst" with "In response to."  Amidst means
> "in the middle of."  I find it hard to see how anyone who observes how
> someone else is standing can be in the middle of that stance.
>
> (b)  I suggest inserting a comma after "consultation."
>
> 3.  ' “The EU’s digital strategy can only reach its full potential if
> it systematically focuses on Free Software” Alexander Sander, FSFE
> senior policy consultant emphasized.'
>
> (a)  Insert a comma after "Software."  Separate the quotation from the
> name of the source.
>
> (b)  Insert a comma after "consultant."  The title should be
> surrounded by commas.
>
>
> For the news item, "Bring Back Free Software Funding: Give Your
> Feedback to the European Commission"
>
> 4.  "A few weeks ago the European Commission made the decision to stop
> funding the Next Generation Internet initiative (NGI) in its then
> current draft for the Horizon Europe 2025 Work Programme,"  Replace
> the comma at the end of this sentence with a period (full stop).
>
> 5.  "This decision results in a loss of €27 million for Software
> Freedom."  Replace "Software Freedom" with "software freedom."  The
> general FSFE usage is to capitalize "Free Software" but not "software
> freedom."  See examples of both usages in the first paragraph of this
> news item and elsewhere in this paragraph.
>
> 6.  "a more open, independent and accessible internet"  Insert an
> Oxford comma after "independent."
>
> 7.  "Cutting funding for Free Software threatens to undermine this
> progress and potentially pushing Europe away from policies"
>
> (a)  I suggest removing "potentially."  The idea of potentiality is
> already fully expressed by saying that this is a threat.
>
> (b)  Replace "pushing" with "push" to be consistent with "undermine."
>
> 8.  "That is why we demand that the €27 million for 2025 to be back as
> well as secured, sustainable long-term funding for Free Software."
>
> (a)  Remove "to."  The sentence is grammatically correct without this word.
>
> (b)  Insert "brought" after be.  The demand is, in my view, rather
> that something be done (bringing back) rather than that the funding
> simply appear.
>
> (c)  I suggest inserting "demanding" after "as."  The two demands are
> somewhat different.  One demand is for immediate action, the other for
> a change in policy in the future.  So I think that it is good to
> phrase this as two separate demands.
>
> 9.  Heading:  "How to Take Action?"  I suggest removing the question
> mark.  Yes, this section can be phrased as a question, but I think
> that it is better phrased as an answer.
>
> 10.  "Participating is simple and it doesn’t take too long ."  Remove
> the space between "long" and the period (full stop) that follows it.
>
> 11.  "However, one of the biggest challenges we still face today is
> the vendor lock in and a lack of interoperability."
>
> (a)  I suggest replacing "one of the biggest challenges we still face
> today is" with "among the biggest challenges we still face today are."
>   It seems to me that there are two (related) challenges listed, rather
> than just one.
>
> (b)  Remove the second occurrence of "the" (before "vendor").  English usage.
>
> 12.  We strongly advise to prioritise the use and distribution of Free
> Software as well as providing financial support to relevant projects
> and the Free Software ecosystem.  I suggest replacing "to prioritise"
> with "prioritising" to be grammatically parallel to "providing."
>
> 13.  "focusing on independence, resilience, control, security and
> sovereignty"  Insert an Oxford comma after "security."
>
> 14.  "better and more secure software, tailored to their needs but
> also"  Insert a comma after "needs" joining with the comma after
> "software" to surround the phrase.
>
> 15.  "The Digital Europe Programme could only unfold its full
> potential"  I suggest replacing "could" with "can."  This looks
> forward, rather than backward.
>
> 16.  "the EU can assure that tax's payers money"  Replace "tax's
> payers" with "taxpayers' ".  (Possessive plural.)
>
> 17.  "An open and interoperable digital public sector, is critical for
> addressing"  Remove the comma after "sector."  It is a good general
> rule that it is wrong to have just a single comma between the subject
> and verb of a sentence.  (A pair of commas is common, and sometimes
> there will be three or more.  But not just one.)
>
> 18.  "which strengthens our common argument for sustainable funding
> for Free Software demonstrating that this demand comes from an engaged
> community"  I suggest inserting "while" before "demonstrating."  The
> unstated point here is that simple copying of a provided text can make
> even massive quantities of submissions unpersuasive.
>
> 19.  "If you should successfully submit a response"  I suggest
> removing "should."  While "should" is grammatically correct, the
> sentence is much stronger without it.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 11:10 AM Ana Galan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> we want to send tomorrow (wed Sep 11) before 11 am the following PR and news item:
>>
>> https://webpreview.fsfe.org/cgi/fsfe.pl?pad=1274
>>
>> https://webpreview.fsfe.org/cgi/fsfe.pl?pad=1273
>>
>> I know it is a last minute thing but it would be great if you could help with its translation.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Ana
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Translators mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>>
>> This mailing list is covered by the FSFE's Code of Conduct. All
>> participants are kindly asked to be excellent to each other:
>> https://fsfe.org/about/codeofconduct
>
>
-- 
Ana Galan - Senior Project Manager Communications
Free Software Foundation Europe
Schönhauser Allee 6/7, 10119 Berlin, Germany | t:+49 157 92 34 72 12
Registered at Amtsgericht Hamburg, VR 17030  |(fsfe.org/support)

_______________________________________________
Translators mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

This mailing list is covered by the FSFE's Code of Conduct. All
participants are kindly asked to be excellent to each other:
https://fsfe.org/about/codeofconduct
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.