Re: [URGENT) [proofread] [EN]
Ana Galan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.fsf.europe.translators |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Richard, thanks for your fast proofread. Best, Ana On 9/10/24 21:55, Richard L. Schmeidler wrote: > I am attaching versions of the xhtml from the two webpreviews that reflect my > suggestions for improvements. > > > For the press release, "The FSFE demands EU Commission sustainable > long-term Free Software funding" > > 1. "In the wake of the recent €27 million cut in the NGI funding, the > Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) is responding to growing > society concern by participating in a public consultation of the > European Commission." I suggest either omitting "society" or > replacing "society concern" with "concern in society." To say > "society concern" seems to me to be strange English usage. Omitting > "society" solves the usage problem by omitting the rather vague > assertion that society is concerned and leaving unstated who is > concerned. If you want to retain the idea that society is concerned, > I suggest changing the word order. > > 2. "Amidst the European Commission's unclear stance on future > funding, the FSFE has participated in the public consultation pushing > to ensure that Free Software solutions receive the necessary long-term > funding." > > (a) I suggest replacing "Amidst" with "In response to." Amidst means > "in the middle of." I find it hard to see how anyone who observes how > someone else is standing can be in the middle of that stance. > > (b) I suggest inserting a comma after "consultation." > > 3. ' “The EU’s digital strategy can only reach its full potential if > it systematically focuses on Free Software” Alexander Sander, FSFE > senior policy consultant emphasized.' > > (a) Insert a comma after "Software." Separate the quotation from the > name of the source. > > (b) Insert a comma after "consultant." The title should be > surrounded by commas. > > > For the news item, "Bring Back Free Software Funding: Give Your > Feedback to the European Commission" > > 4. "A few weeks ago the European Commission made the decision to stop > funding the Next Generation Internet initiative (NGI) in its then > current draft for the Horizon Europe 2025 Work Programme," Replace > the comma at the end of this sentence with a period (full stop). > > 5. "This decision results in a loss of €27 million for Software > Freedom." Replace "Software Freedom" with "software freedom." The > general FSFE usage is to capitalize "Free Software" but not "software > freedom." See examples of both usages in the first paragraph of this > news item and elsewhere in this paragraph. > > 6. "a more open, independent and accessible internet" Insert an > Oxford comma after "independent." > > 7. "Cutting funding for Free Software threatens to undermine this > progress and potentially pushing Europe away from policies" > > (a) I suggest removing "potentially." The idea of potentiality is > already fully expressed by saying that this is a threat. > > (b) Replace "pushing" with "push" to be consistent with "undermine." > > 8. "That is why we demand that the €27 million for 2025 to be back as > well as secured, sustainable long-term funding for Free Software." > > (a) Remove "to." The sentence is grammatically correct without this word. > > (b) Insert "brought" after be. The demand is, in my view, rather > that something be done (bringing back) rather than that the funding > simply appear. > > (c) I suggest inserting "demanding" after "as." The two demands are > somewhat different. One demand is for immediate action, the other for > a change in policy in the future. So I think that it is good to > phrase this as two separate demands. > > 9. Heading: "How to Take Action?" I suggest removing the question > mark. Yes, this section can be phrased as a question, but I think > that it is better phrased as an answer. > > 10. "Participating is simple and it doesn’t take too long ." Remove > the space between "long" and the period (full stop) that follows it. > > 11. "However, one of the biggest challenges we still face today is > the vendor lock in and a lack of interoperability." > > (a) I suggest replacing "one of the biggest challenges we still face > today is" with "among the biggest challenges we still face today are." > It seems to me that there are two (related) challenges listed, rather > than just one. > > (b) Remove the second occurrence of "the" (before "vendor"). English usage. > > 12. We strongly advise to prioritise the use and distribution of Free > Software as well as providing financial support to relevant projects > and the Free Software ecosystem. I suggest replacing "to prioritise" > with "prioritising" to be grammatically parallel to "providing." > > 13. "focusing on independence, resilience, control, security and > sovereignty" Insert an Oxford comma after "security." > > 14. "better and more secure software, tailored to their needs but > also" Insert a comma after "needs" joining with the comma after > "software" to surround the phrase. > > 15. "The Digital Europe Programme could only unfold its full > potential" I suggest replacing "could" with "can." This looks > forward, rather than backward. > > 16. "the EU can assure that tax's payers money" Replace "tax's > payers" with "taxpayers' ". (Possessive plural.) > > 17. "An open and interoperable digital public sector, is critical for > addressing" Remove the comma after "sector." It is a good general > rule that it is wrong to have just a single comma between the subject > and verb of a sentence. (A pair of commas is common, and sometimes > there will be three or more. But not just one.) > > 18. "which strengthens our common argument for sustainable funding > for Free Software demonstrating that this demand comes from an engaged > community" I suggest inserting "while" before "demonstrating." The > unstated point here is that simple copying of a provided text can make > even massive quantities of submissions unpersuasive. > > 19. "If you should successfully submit a response" I suggest > removing "should." While "should" is grammatically correct, the > sentence is much stronger without it. > > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 11:10 AM Ana Galan <[email protected]> wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> we want to send tomorrow (wed Sep 11) before 11 am the following PR and news item: >> >> https://webpreview.fsfe.org/cgi/fsfe.pl?pad=1274 >> >> https://webpreview.fsfe.org/cgi/fsfe.pl?pad=1273 >> >> I know it is a last minute thing but it would be great if you could help with its translation. >> >> Best, >> >> Ana >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Translators mailing list -- [email protected] >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >> >> This mailing list is covered by the FSFE's Code of Conduct. All >> participants are kindly asked to be excellent to each other: >> https://fsfe.org/about/codeofconduct > > -- Ana Galan - Senior Project Manager Communications Free Software Foundation Europe Schönhauser Allee 6/7, 10119 Berlin, Germany | t:+49 157 92 34 72 12 Registered at Amtsgericht Hamburg, VR 17030 |(fsfe.org/support) _______________________________________________ Translators mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] This mailing list is covered by the FSFE's Code of Conduct. All participants are kindly asked to be excellent to each other: https://fsfe.org/about/codeofconduct