Re: [OS:N:] Another question about Licenses

Alexandre Oliva <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.open-source-now
Organization GCC Team, Red Hat
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Nov  8, 2003, "Anthony Saffer" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I can see your point. I suppose my biggest concern is that of the problems
> that might arise from our customers buying the software from us, having it
> modified by someone else, then expecting us to support those modifications.

Signed RPMS and SRPMS could help minimize this effect.

> Additionally, I've recently seen a niche company offer it's code as open
> source under the GPL and then got sued because "their software" broke the
> clients computer.

Being alive is enough to bring you risks of getting sued :-)  I hope a
court would trivially see that they were not running your software,
but rather something else.  Just like removing a label can void the
warranty of a product, tweaking the software may void any
responsibility the original developer had on it.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                 aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist                Professional serial bug killer


_______________________________________________
Subscription and Archive: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/open-source-now-list/
-
For K12OS technical help join K12OSN:
<https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.