Re: Age old question: FBSD vs Linux
Chris Boyd <cboyd-1sEnLahcNUY4yJ9dIELTZQC/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.internet-access |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Jun 9, 2009, at 9:57 AM, [email protected] wrote: > I keep hearing rumblings about how FreeBSD has fallen far behind Linux > over the past few years. I've encountered the occasional issue where > certain server software requires Linux, or at least supposedly runs > much > better on Linux (JVM, etc). I also get consulting work where I work > on > Linux, so although I am much more familar and comfortable with > FreeBSD, I > do have some Linux exposure, and it might serve me better to become as > comfortable with it a I am FreeBSD. I'd like to hear the thoughs of > those > here who've faced similar decisions, or at least extensive exposure to > both. All our shared web hosts, DNS, NMS etc runs FreeBSD. Only found one thing so far that I could not make work (magento ecommerece stuff). Once up and running, I find that FreeBSD is more flexible and stable than the Linux distros we use. Need a bleeding edge PHP? It's probably in ports, no big deal. Does take a long time to get a new system running. On the Linux side, we use CentOS and a little Ubuntu. Updates to kernels come along pretty often, so you have to reboot. CentOS packages tend to be a bit older than some developers like. Maintaining software outside of the distro's update scheme is a pain. But you can get a new Linux box up and running very quickly. MySQL was a bit of a dog on FreeBSD 4 and 5. 6 and 7 run MySQL really fast now. If you know FreeBSD and like FreeBSD, stick with FreeBSD. --Chris -- Eat sushi frequently. - Avi [email protected] is the human contact address. [email protected] is the list posting address. See below URL for subscribe/unsubscribe and list options: http://inet-access.net/mailman/listinfo/list