Re: Router choice.
"Marlon K. Schafer" <[email protected]> Thu, 13 May 2010 11:43:34 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.internet-access |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <ED42D8B9EB034226B23FCC80658B7F23@mlaptop2> |
I don't run at the bandwidth levels you guys do so I don't know if this helps or not. Also I have no idea what the costs of a pci oc3 adapter would be so your prices will clearly be different... I'm running Mikrotik for my routers. www.mikrotik.com They have hardware solutions available but I buy Dell servers to put them on. My latest will be a quad core 2. something ghz processor, 8 gigs of ram and 4 gigE ethernet ports. I picked up a new monitor etc. too all for a shade over $1,600. The solid state sata disk drive AND the router OS that'll run on the box will cost under $200. I'll pay a consultant http://www.butchevans.com/ a few hundred more to program and test it. We'll be (finally) setting up with our own IP space and bgp. I dropped Cisco in favor of MT and have been REALLY happy with the product. It's more powerful than the Cisco gear was (does a LOT more things) and has been just as reliable. I think I'm going on 6 or 7 years with MT now. I've also got a router from www.imagestream.com. Great company, great product. They don't have a nice GUI like MT does so they require a lot more consulting/higher costs for my operation. I'm a real point and click kind of guy but the folks I know that can handle an ssh interface love the imagestream gear they use. Hope that helps Kieth, marlon ----- Original Message ----- From: "Keith" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 4:24 PM Subject: Router choice. > > We are buying a new router. Its replacing a 7206 with an NPE-G1. > > There are 3 OC3's delivered on a GigE pipe. We will be adding another > OC3 in the next couple of months for a total of 4. We take just a > default route from our upstream with BGP. We would like to take a full > view again. We used to but the table got bigger than the RAM in the 7206 > and we went to taking just default instead. > > We have gone out to Cisco and Juniper and gotten quotes on an MX240 and > 2 - 1002 Cisco boxes. Functionally and port density they are about the > same, but I think the MX240 has more ports in the quote. We are getting 2 > 1002's for redundency, but the 240 has it all in one chassis. > > Pricing is close. Our upstream core is Juniper too. > > Having only ever used an M10 for about a month about 5 yrs ago in > our lab environment (we got a loaner) I'm a greenhorn with Juniper. > I liked it, but it was out of our range at the time. > > With all things sort of being equal, I'd like some real world input on > these two routers and maybe a bit of a real world comparison. > > Thanks, > Keith > > -- > Eat sushi frequently. - Avi > [email protected] is the human contact address. > [email protected] is the list posting address. > See below URL for subscribe/unsubscribe and list options: > http://inet-access.net/mailman/listinfo/list -- Eat sushi frequently. - Avi [email protected] is the human contact address. [email protected] is the list posting address. See below URL for subscribe/unsubscribe and list options: http://inet-access.net/mailman/listinfo/list