Re: Charging for traffic across network versus to Internet
Pete Templin <[email protected]> Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:14:33 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.internet-access |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 6/14/11 5:47 PM, Rick Kunkel wrote: > 1. How many of you folks charge for traffic across your network that > doesn't go out onto the Internet? The replication example above is my > most immediate good example. At a consulting client (which is my only exposure to SP-type activities these days), the client gets an MPLS VPN where we build all of their infrastructure. They get one or more "egress points" where the VPN connects to "the Internet", and those are the points where the customer is metered or rate-limited. I think the MPLS services are lumped into the customer's aggregate bill (they tend not to do line-item-type billing for their customers). At a former employer, we never had anyone get an MPLS VPN and our Internet access, but we priced the MPLS VPN ports based on the port speed (T1, MetroE, etc.) and that handled the billing function. pt -- Eat sushi frequently. - Avi [email protected] is the human contact address. [email protected] is the list posting address. See below URL for subscribe/unsubscribe and list options: http://inet-access.net/mailman/listinfo/list