Re: bandwidth from Telco
"Patrick W. Gilmore" <[email protected]> Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:20:08 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.internet-access |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Feb 10, 2012, at 2:00 , Frank Bulk wrote: > It depends how they sell it -- they might sell it as the total of the > upstream and downstream. But technically it should be able to do 100 up and > 100 down, so that he can charge you 200. =) That is only how they bill it. The definition of full-duplex is that you can send an receive simultaneously. If they say 100 Mbps means the total of send + receive, that is half-duplex. Since they are clearly confused, tell them to buy a dictionary (since using BING is clearly beyond them). It should difficult for anyone to argue "X != X". That said, if anyone could argue such a thing, it would be a telephone company technician.... -- TTFN, patrick > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Jim Pazarena > Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 12:43 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: bandwidth from Telco > > I am confused and possibly being fed a crock by my Telco. > We have a 100Mbps full duplex circuit. > > However the Telco tells me that the 100Mbps capability is > aggregate total in both directions. In that if our downstream is > sucking 70Mbps, there is only 30Mbps remaining for upstream. > > Shouldn't I be able to pull and push 100Mbps in each direction > AT THE SAME TIME? Or is this typical of a Telco delivery and > pipe sizing? -- Eat sushi frequently. - Avi [email protected] is the human contact address. [email protected] is the list posting address. See below URL for subscribe/unsubscribe and list options: http://inet-access.net/mailman/listinfo/list