Re: opt-out registry comments
"dominic" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.ioz |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Wanton defamers, purveyors of false claims & malicious detractors beware.... http://www.dmasa.org/dmasa/dma_extra.php?id=269 Response from: The Direct Marketing Association of South Africa The DMASA has come out in defence of its ability to manage the National Opt Out Registry after a malicious spat with contenders for the tender were fuelled on ITWeb. "The DMASA has been the target of malicious attacks on its credibility with outside parties making claims in a bid to compromise the DMASA's good standing with the National Consumer Commission ahead of a hotly contended tender process. The DMASA is a body established to protect the interests of consumers against unwanted and unsolicited direct marketing. As a body, its role is to regulate the direct marketing industry and in this regard the association has played a fundamental role in implementing legislation in consultation with the Department of Trade and Industry in the interests of consumer protection. At the same time the association has played an important role in finding a balance between the interests of business and the right to market products and services, that is both in line with the interests of consumer protection and to the satisfaction of the consumer commissioner," says Brian Mdluli, CEO of the DMASA. The Direct Marketing Association under the mandate from its members took the lead five years ago to develop a national opt out registry that would allow South African consumers to opt out from unwanted communications from its members - this was done long, long before it even became a legal prerequisite in terms of the now implemented Consumer Protection Act. This was done entirely at a cost to the association and its members and at no stage has the consumer ever had to pay for the use of the system - something that is highly unlikely to be achieved by any other party. "The infrastructure and methodologies are already in place and working successfully which means that there will be no delays in offering consumers a means to opt out from spam and unsolicited marketing and no excuse for companies not to comply with the provisions of opt out marketing," explains Brian. "The DMASA is serious about consumer protection and has walked the path for the past five years with legislators - the only industry association to actively do so - to finally bring to fruition the biggest piece of consumer protection law on the continent. The National DNC registry is the next step in this process towards protecting consumers and the DMA is supremely positioned to offer this service as we have been operating it for a number of years already. It is a telling sign of the calibre of the people behind the attacks when, up until now when the vast amount of the work had to be done at our expense, that they are now such vocal proponents of consumer protection when there is the chance of a financial benefit for them doing so," says Brian. "Most critical to point out, is that the National Do Not Contact database is hosted securely on a dedicated server, so any attempts to breach our information website or network will in no way compromise the DNC registry. Our website which contains information about the DMA and our activities is purely a marketing tool which is entirely separate to the secure server for the DNC registry. Any attempts to compromise the DMA's website and claims of malware being found on the site have absolutely no bearing as the DNC system is securely managed and hosted off site," explains Brian. The DMASA is fully committed to consumer protection and assures all consumers who have registered on the DNC database that their information is secure. "We are busy consulting with our legal team at the moment with regard to the reports and e-mails that are flying around and furthermore tracing the sources of these attacks. We will be taking action against the purveyors of these false claims and accusations that are based in wanton defamation. We will not be deterred in our efforts to ensure that we act in the best interests of South African consumers as an industry body. We urge consumers and media to exercise their discretion and separate the hysteria from the facts when clearly there are a number of private individuals and companies who are serving up these false claims in their own self-interest. "We will not be drawn into this quagmire of slander as it does absolutely nothing to further the interests of consumers on such an important matter. We trust that the National Consumer Commission will let the law run its course and do what is best for the South African public. We also issue an open challenge for these detractors to meet us around a table, to debate the issues around the opt out register, the implications of opt out and opt in laws for South African business, and to put measure and backbone to their claims," concludes Mdluli. > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Simeon Miteff > Sent: 01 August 2011 12:49 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [IOZ] opt-out registry comments > > So I understand from the CPA requires that spammers accept direct opt- > out > requests from the public, in addition to providing for the opt-out > registry. > > What about a hack where a third party broadcasts opt-out requests to a > list of > known spammers on behalf of registered users? > > I realize this has the disastrous drawback of helping spammers who > intend to > break the law build their spam lists, but if the alternative is a DMA- > run > opt-out registry that might happen anyway... > > On 07/31/11 22:43, Mike Silber wrote: > > Simeon > > > > Comments were solicited by the NCC. > > > > Mike > > > > On 2011/07/28 10:44 AM, Simeon Miteff wrote: > >> Hi Joe > >> > >> Pardon my ignorance, but isn't spam illegal? > >> > >> Regards, > >> Simeon. > >> > >> On 28/07/2011 09:45, Joe Botha wrote: > >>> Hi! > >>> > >>> Please consider writing an email to the National Consumer > Commission with > >>> your views on how the national opt-out registry should be operated. > >>> Deadline > >>> is this Friday. > >>> > >>> Some details: > >>> http://www.swimgeek.com/blog/2011/07/27/ncc-opt-out-registry- > comments/ > >>> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> IOZ mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.internet.org.za/mailman/listinfo/ioz > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > IOZ mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.internet.org.za/mailman/listinfo/ioz > > > _______________________________________________ > IOZ mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.internet.org.za/mailman/listinfo/ioz _______________________________________________ IOZ mailing list [email protected] http://lists.internet.org.za/mailman/listinfo/ioz