Re: co.za domain names & the ZACR
[email protected] Thu, 27 Jul 2017 14:35:30 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.ioz |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 27/07/2017 14:22, ox wrote: > On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 13:18:22 +0200 > Calvin Browne <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 27/07/2017 12:11, ox wrote: >>> <SNIP> >>> In this specific case, the "registrant" requested their registrar to >>> assist with a co.za domain update. >>> >>> the registrar refused. >> If by update, you mean transfer from one registrar to another, the >> registrant is probably barking up the wrong tree by expecting a >> losing registrar to facilitate or do anything. >> >> S/he should probably engage with the gaining registrar. >> >> Reading section 9 will explain that the involvement of the losing >> registrar is not needed. >> > You did not read my initial "heads up" post? No problem, I will say it > again, and in other words: I did read it. So, let me use different words as well - If the losing registrar does nothing the transfer goes through. Go and read section 9 before saying incorrect things please. --Calvin > > The ZACR (and you) are wrong. and here is why: > > You (and the ZACR) are banking on the registry emails reaching a domain > registrant. > > When the registry fails to send an update via email (as in this > specific example) and in other cases where the registrant email address > > For your information - the @gmail.com account, in the specific example- > did not receive any update tickets (for whatever reason) and the > Registrant - effectively - had NO CONTROL - (neither did the gaining > registrar) > > The "losing" registrar has been paid their fee - Also see the Consumer > Act i.e - They took money from a consumer, etc. > > Without their "kindness" or "favours" or the ZACR doing the Registrant > a "favour" > > A domain update would not be possible. > > So, imnsho not only is the attitude of the ZACR EVIL/WRONG > > so is the attitude of the losing Registrar in ignoring the consumer, > whom they took money from. > > Anyway, if there was no "favour" done - this would now be a court case > - and it will be interesting to see who would have been awarded costs > in this matter... > > Andre > > > > _______________________________________________ > IOZ mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.internet.org.za/mailman/listinfo/ioz _______________________________________________ IOZ mailing list [email protected] http://lists.internet.org.za/mailman/listinfo/ioz