Re: co.za domain names & the ZACR
ox <[email protected]> Thu, 27 Jul 2017 15:22:53 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.ioz |
|---|---|
| Organization | ox.co.za |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Top posting, real quick - before everyone like Ed Pascoe wades in with their "feelings" and accusations (whether true or false). There is a critical and fatal flaw in the EPP system & Policies. - This is a fact - not an opinion. If you are still confused - read the above paragraph. The Policy says: If nothing happens - a domain is transferred In real life (IRL) if nothing happens - nothing happens. This has been like this for many years. Here comes the rub: If it works as per section 9 - anyone of the "registrars" some with no technical skills, some of very dubious corporate ethics, can: Update any domain of any one of these "registrars" and many of them are clueless... But When the system does need to work, as per the 'published" policy i.e Section 9 (9.3 Point 9) And the ZACR as well as the losing Registrar - are doing "favours" then, this is untenable. As the Consumer (domain Registrant) has no control over that which they paid for. So, Calvin assumed that Section 9 is functional, whereas it is not. Has not worked like that for years... Anyway, just for clarity Andre On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 15:10:10 +0200 ox <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 14:35:30 +0200 > [email protected] wrote: > > I did read it. > > So, let me use different words as well - If the losing registrar > > does nothing the transfer goes through. > > Go and read section 9 before saying incorrect things please. > > > Would you like an actual example domain name of where 9.3 - Point 9 > failed to work? > > Will that help you solve the problem? > > Andre > > > _______________________________________________ IOZ mailing list [email protected] http://lists.internet.org.za/mailman/listinfo/ioz