Re: co.za domain names & the ZACR
ox <[email protected]> Thu, 27 Jul 2017 16:14:27 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.ioz |
|---|---|
| Organization | ox.co.za |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 15:14:28 +0200 Calvin Browne <[email protected]> wrote: > On 27/07/2017 15:10, ox wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 14:35:30 +0200 > > [email protected] wrote: > >> I did read it. > >> So, let me use different words as well - If the losing registrar > >> does nothing the transfer goes through. > >> Go and read section 9 before saying incorrect things please. > >> > > Would you like an actual example domain name of where 9.3 - Point 9 > > failed to work? > > > > Will that help you solve the problem? > > nope - not necessary. > Thank you. Can I also ask; in the light of this, the Registry (and many Registrars) attitude of "favours" is obviously evil/wrong. Do you (not speaking for ZACR) agree that there is a "non good" vibe and that there is maybe a need for some reflection (and attitude change) And, the next complaint(s) will be: Registrar x, from France (only an example not picking on the French :) ) sent 5000 automated updates, I did not see them and all my domains have been updated... That registrar is now updating all the domain registrants, and there is nothing that the "lost Registrar" or the original domain registrant, can do... The problem is that the checks & balances in, for example, the .com Registry (domain locks, etc etc) does not exist in co.za Your comments? Andre _______________________________________________ IOZ mailing list [email protected] http://lists.internet.org.za/mailman/listinfo/ioz