Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF
Lucien Hoydic via NANOG <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.nanog |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <7CQZ2cb7v2KTdDEDnz5nTOoBbnkPkCaTSZFFYPfW0zxkFl5hKKM3o2entZGQHUYpUSCMei1U4p3N4ae5fSwenmduTw2FyrRGCnL3fcrRfNA=@lucienhoydic.com> |
I see no need for this IPv8. IPv6 was carefully engineered over many years and while not perfect, works and is deployed. What problem are you trying to solve? I seem to have missed that. No one is going to adopt IPv8. This is an academic discussion at best. On Thursday, April 30th, 2026 at 10:51 AM, Joe Klein via NANOG <[email protected]> wrote: > This is very funny! > > - In 2004, very talented Chinese developers worked to implement IPv9. At > present there are exclusive patents, but have yet to seen any code. > > - Over 20 cumulative years, there are about 0.5–2 trillion IPv6 address > instances, with the high side is driven by mobile devices, Wi-Fi roaming, > privacy-address rotation, VMs, containers, VPNs, and tunnels. In short, > this covers the ocean floor, caves, areas near Earth, and deep space. Will > you and your team pay for the IPv4/IPv6 change? When will you submit the > patent applications (Similary to Microsoft patent for SEND/CGA)? > > Have fun. > > OO. > > Joe Klein > > "inveniet viam, aut faciet" --- Seneca's Hercules Furens (Act II, Scene 1) > "*I skate to where the puck is going to be, not to where it has been." > -- *Wayne > Gretzky > "I never lose. I either win or learn" - Nelson Mandela > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2026, 10:51 AM Tom Beecher via NANOG <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > Tough love is needed here, and the list is not providing it. You're > > > not being polite, you're enabling. > > > > > > Only works when the recipient is actually open to receiving feedback and > > collaborating. > > > > Reading Mr. Thain's replies here and on int-area answers that question > > quite rapidly. > > > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 2:35 AM Saku Ytti via NANOG <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > Tough love is needed here, and the list is not providing it. You're > > > not being polite, you're enabling. > > > > > > Stop supporting this LLM psychosis. > > > > > > -- > > > ++ytti > > > _______________________________________________ > > > NANOG mailing list > > > > > > > > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/QAQPQMJT3AEGHZERA2XJW3WIWBAMHBAI/ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > NANOG mailing list > > > > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/YAH63OJ4IJ3GKNROAILZHO6YXQQ5NQ2S/ > _______________________________________________ > NANOG mailing list > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/WWUAVWF5VUGLB7FCE6NE4LAMOGPDM7LP/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/HTZGUHK5OFQTIOM4PGETYTNEUIWPDEDW/