Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF

IPv6 is deployed?  There is a routine thread here a couple of times a year
complaining about how it isn't.

On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 12:44 PM Lucien Hoydic via NANOG <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I see no need for this IPv8. IPv6 was carefully engineered over many years
> and while not perfect, works and is deployed. What problem are you trying
> to solve? I seem to have missed that.
>
> No one is going to adopt IPv8. This is an academic discussion at best.
>
>
>
> On Thursday, April 30th, 2026 at 10:51 AM, Joe Klein via NANOG <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > This is very funny!
> >
> > - In 2004, very talented Chinese developers worked to implement IPv9. At
> > present there are exclusive patents, but have yet to seen any code.
> >
> > - Over 20 cumulative years, there are about 0.5–2 trillion IPv6 address
> > instances, with the high side is driven by mobile devices, Wi-Fi roaming,
> > privacy-address rotation, VMs, containers, VPNs, and tunnels. In short,
> > this covers the ocean floor, caves, areas near Earth, and deep space.
> Will
> > you and your team pay for the IPv4/IPv6 change? When will you submit the
> > patent applications (Similary to Microsoft patent for SEND/CGA)?
> >
> > Have fun.
> >
> > OO.
> >
> > Joe Klein
> >
> > "inveniet viam, aut faciet" --- Seneca's Hercules Furens (Act II, Scene
> 1)
> > "*I skate to where the puck is going to be, not to where it has been."
> > -- *Wayne
> > Gretzky
> > "I never lose. I either win or learn" - Nelson Mandela
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2026, 10:51 AM Tom Beecher via NANOG <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > Tough love is needed here, and the list is not providing it. You're
> > > > not being polite, you're enabling.
> > >
> > >
> > > Only works when the recipient is actually open to receiving feedback
> and
> > > collaborating.
> > >
> > > Reading Mr. Thain's replies here and on int-area answers that question
> > > quite rapidly.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 2:35 AM Saku Ytti via NANOG <
> [email protected]
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Tough love is needed here, and the list is not providing it. You're
> > > > not being polite, you're enabling.
> > > >
> > > > Stop supporting this LLM psychosis.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >   ++ytti
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > NANOG mailing list
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/QAQPQMJT3AEGHZERA2XJW3WIWBAMHBAI/
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > NANOG mailing list
> > >
> > >
> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/YAH63OJ4IJ3GKNROAILZHO6YXQQ5NQ2S/
> > _______________________________________________
> > NANOG mailing list
> >
> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/WWUAVWF5VUGLB7FCE6NE4LAMOGPDM7LP/
> _______________________________________________
> NANOG mailing list
>
> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/HTZGUHK5OFQTIOM4PGETYTNEUIWPDEDW/
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/EIZ73ZKWZQMCTM3OT64ZG5DT5FXT5QJD/