Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF
Marco Moock via NANOG <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.nanog |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 02.05.26 um 05:11 schrieb Jamie Thain via NANOG: > But the real killer is two things. IPv6 isn't a low cost upgrade, and the > enterprise is always going to need IPv4. Every change is creating costs in such an environment. As you proposal cannot replace IPv4 backward-compatible, it has the same issues as IPv6 already has, but is new, more complicated and will take another 10+ years to be even supported on hard- and software. -- Gruß Marco Junk-Mail bitte an [email protected] _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/F4R2ZC3U3CIOII4UJK5SYIYNABROT776/