Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF
Jamie Thain via NANOG <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.nanog |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGPjif_GXQsvg1VA6K_5HWiej1QUCtw18sQW248v8h=MjBEGYQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Mikeal Ipv10 Was A dual stack idea. Again since you can't do the analysis steps then just send me a tape recording. Jamie On Sat., May 2, 2026, 3:08 a.m. Mikael Abrahamsson, <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 2 May 2026, Jamie Thain via NANOG wrote: > > > 4. It will be a firmware upgrade. > > You've come to an operator forum and are making these naive (and obviously > wrong) claims. IPv10 guy did the same, and he was equally wrong. > > So again, start implementing, and you'll learn a lot and realise that > you're wrong. We keep telling you you're wrong, you don't listen. Stop > wasting brain bandwidth for everybody. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-omar-ipv10/10/ > > He wasted a lot of time, you're doing the same. > > -- > Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected] _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/CLVD4EUV7WEXPQTENKNOWKAC36AIGOF6/