Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF
Mikael Abrahamsson via NANOG <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.nanog |
|---|---|
| Organization | People's Front Against WWW |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 2 May 2026, Jamie Thain wrote: > Ipv10 Was A dual stack idea. Everything that isn't IPv4 will be a new stack. This was realised already in the 90s, and that's why we have IPv6 that's now close to 30 years into its deployment. Adding another stack in the mix won't help. If you would have done what you're doing back in mid 90s, it might have helped. You're 3 decades too late. > Again since you can't do the analysis steps then just send me a tape > recording. There is nothing to analyze. You're proposing something that isn't backwards compatible, and you don't seem to understand this is what you're proposing. Same as IPv10 guy. So start implementing, you might understand it then. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected] _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/U3MG225M67HI4HB566MTV2NLDW3P6OFT/