Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF - just build it

Joe

I've been told no ways that it's broken. This phase is about as serious as
people telling me I'm wrong.

So far about 21 days ago someone told me it was silicon. So i worked that
one out.

Put the ipv8 asns your responsible for in VRFs.

Other than that I've faced a lot of "im an idiot" but no ipv8 doesn't work
because...

It's usually an argument from authority, ipv8 doesn't work because i say
so, rather than an argument from fact.

Ipv8 will gain a new afi type but it can ride in MP-BGP VPN-IPv4 for a long
while.

Jamie

On Sun., May 3, 2026, 2:15 p.m. Joe Provo via NANOG, <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On Sat, May 02, 2026 at 09:14:32PM -0300, Jamie Thain via NANOG wrote:
> > Kevin
> >
> > Code is expensive.
>
> Code is cheap; maintenance is expensive. Assertions regarding TCO
> based on no experience nor testing is farcical.
>
> > I want a sense of anything is wrong first.
>
> Frankly, I don't believe you. You've been repeatedly told the many
> ways this is broken and are arguing instead of listening.
>
> I also think you've actively ignored the success of IPv6-mostly
> enterprise deployments relying on DHCP option 108. That's a good
> example of vendor adoption of protocol changes.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Joe
>
> --
> Posted from my personal account - see X-Disclaimer header.
> Joe Provo / Gweep / Earthling
> _______________________________________________
> NANOG mailing list
>
> https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/Q624G6CXBMKB3WZOAP45D3LDJJBDGY7Q/
>
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/M3UXJKAOR7ZDQBI2OT3K3726H3SOXYFW/