Re: IPv8 / BGP8 / CF
Jamie Thain via NANOG <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.nanog |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGPjif99g9pyFKZE38hM1j2gs6ybW0zaE++u_SNASh5nZZCtSA@mail.gmail.com> |
Marco And ipv6 is no where on there radar. So fix ipv4. I appreciate your input. Jamie On Sun., May 3, 2026, 4:33 a.m. Marco Moock via NANOG, < [email protected]> wrote: > Am 03.05.26 um 00:30 schrieb Jamie Thain via NANOG: > > > > * IPv6 wasn't a surgical fix for address exhaustion — it bundled the > > address-space change with a full redesign of neighbor discovery, > > autoconfiguration, header structure, and operational tooling. > > That wasn't the issue. The issue is that it takes some time to prepare > and do the implementation of another network protocol, regardless how it > is called or how it works in detail. No one cares about ARP, nor NDP. It > is there and works. > > Corporate networks need address plan, firewall plans etc. and that needs > to be extended if any new protocol is going to be implemented. > > -- > Gruß > Marco > > Junk-Mail bitte an [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > NANOG mailing list > > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/LZX6VCZU5UMMHFQRIH5ZHJEK3I6V2ST4/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/AVIU5UM7TNRP7DARNQCQXX6EVBJRANVR/