Re: IPv4 flag day

Marco Moock via NANOG <[email protected]> Wed, 17 Jun 2026 09:27:17 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.org.operators.nanog
Organization keine vorhanden, alles chaotisch
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Am 17.06.26 um 08:46 schrieb Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG:
> I did believe too that the absence of redundancy for SMB/SOHO is the blocking factor for IPv6 deployment (and send a few messages here).

No, it isn't. Changes are the blocking factors there. If something works 
and does its job, it will not be changed until it doesn't anymore. This 
applies to other protocols (e.g. TLS for HTTPS, SMTP, etc.) too.

It also applies to operating system upgrade or firmware on networking 
devices. It will not be updated until a feature (or bugfix) is really 
necessary. BTDT.

-- 
Gruß
Marco
Muell und Spam bitte an [email protected]

_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list 
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/2D47FPYY5IPHOI4T7XO73WR4VATUEUO6/
OpenPGP_signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 665 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

wsD5BAABCAAjFiEEGHxuJD2s+A3zICvbVZ4aMxpGtGMFAmoyTFYFAwAAAAAACgkQVZ4aMxpGtGPf
Lwv8C2nU0cE4nvTMgvNx21NAO3jlxOHlg2h0JNXBDcpXse7sadsMFCKGmBMqmkqafHcaYZRjkuDg
iOhwiTkbjNUk8+xGIvBB1ZVKVonkh0f5468WiXgfVgMzlSEUbmPRZaSgQ2l2XnZctPni5Riew5F3
pVxijYGEIGqDgw6jkLzmg3gWJeoFBDWhpfJjDmGkFP1bIfLkaKbywZTfdzsSSWlQzu2iY8nUI/1b
CD0r2/i3xtQ6kCDZYY1IM4jXCArXcLr8kwhHrJ0LfPwkjh/Z8ZnLumU5gxetzrV0xBINFmo2JVUm
uNwGiRqKiC53bp39L9Dh3uEo2BtUVU90T7Ns9UUav9InNv7ATMgx09dR4aUMiuiq1sJlc5kI9voq
jr91TDvl+UY9nTTg7Q66fziGXxq6A8WQGzpXyTsDD8660qApG4yarOYWBPYlhEC/HWtuTKfnOPwb
VGo/Wm19he+ZfVMm6NSSmk6afScZ0CxQCrr6Q8pUWdYQmrH3ZUnS+VFrqIbv
=6Y+A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----