Re: IPv4 flag day
Marco Moock via NANOG <[email protected]> Wed, 17 Jun 2026 09:32:29 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.nanog |
|---|---|
| Organization | keine vorhanden, alles chaotisch |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 17.06.26 um 08:29 schrieb Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG: > Has any CPE vendor implemented the redundancy NPTv6 scheme (with all IPv6 features) that Matthew mentioned for NAT44? No, as normal CPE devices are used by home users. They don't need that. Business users buy professional devices and use BGP or other routing protocols for real redundancy. > Reminder: 6man WG makes all possible efforts to block NPTv6. It already exists, IIRC Cisco IOS supports that. -- Gruß Marco Muell und Spam bitte an [email protected] _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/64HPVUSE2EXJH664UAY3T4YJX2G3VQET/
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 665 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsD5BAABCAAjFiEEGHxuJD2s+A3zICvbVZ4aMxpGtGMFAmoyTY0FAwAAAAAACgkQVZ4aMxpGtGND 0Av/ZXTRh3LjPHlq7nm1FFt4AYj2CE6qq6FmGrnmTsVGlVSknHGhvmlgRJq7XxNj5gMBLZPGpWKC +G8Y11IlPw6hv+sR+V/mQQ0mUMl64RexdmzxmD7b7M6Jexh8E1LatTRaahz447Z6wVEmLjzttcje jn6LU5DFKOQ5Acj8bMBNNjq/Yu53l4AoZwyBpXvcyH7NIbALMcCg1MnONI5rdRi2RO+p66iVJ4Up AvJcGmHBg5v/nSvCOwRN32YvnsI/XcIbjrlzdnk0rD09508OnQMKf6ZEKU3bsQ6pfSIzfIyTG6uc 4hRYQZV0/dn+GZtblMS+BPnSfeu1DDxxfPMGgPQbaN9IdgA+YoVRXLZSOYrT5oWLasG68V76VqCO a79usrH+qeaan28ZSDP9b5sj5zORVVB4UasCfTccQggUrUqIs+vtUWcaNwI6274eR4PCDZ4n9bo+ 0SGPjm89n5+k3GnsDkV9UyCMDx99fr4fVVVX3HoPB3/ILY64Qkk6+i/QIhn+ =cwNK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----