Re: Hello Hurricane Electric, doubling the size of our domestic table?

Buying 'domestic' is a way of paying for the privilege of sending/receiving
traffic to Spark :)

On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 5:02 PM, Tom Paseka <[email protected]>
wrote:

> If I can ask, what does a "domestic" table genuinely bring you. If you
> carry routes to your edge(s) that have both peering and transit, do you
> need to extend the DFZ all the way through your network? If you've got a
> single exit path (or a few) do you need to extend the domestic routes any
> further?
>
> Another thing to note: BGP Sanity. Apply AS_PATH filters to all your
> peers. This doubly so if you're extending the routes throughout your
> network. Much of HE's routes might not be relevant to your network and
> could have easily been sanitized with some nice filters.
>
> Also congrats to HE/Team!
> -Tom
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 9:50 PM Tim Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Don't forget that the NZ/AU concept of 'domestic table' is a fairly
>> unique concept that isn't seen in much of the rest of the world- generally
>> any feed is going to be default, a peering feed (customer routes), or a
>> full table.... Doubt anyone thought of it ;).
>>
>> Congrats to Mike & Walt on extending to NZ... pretty cool to see a
>> worldwide carrier finally making it there - fantastic to see how far the NZ
>> internet has progressed!
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 9:47 PM Bill <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Perhaps those that had issues should use such tools as prefix limits on
>>> their inbound feeds. We get notified by our edge routers quite regularly
>>> that the number of prefixes has or is about to max out.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On 19/09/2018, at 4:39 PM, Liam Farr <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> IMO I think its great that a large carrier has come to our neck of the
>>> woods, and they are openly peering on both our major IX's. This is a good
>>> thing for internet in NZ.
>>>
>>> Notifications were sent to the affected parties who peer, months in
>>> advance.
>>>
>>> I don't believe HE had any malicious intent to break your internet.
>>>
>>> If your stuff broke because you have a shit upstream, fix it and move on.
>>>
>>> On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 16:35, Michael Fincham <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 16:32:09 +1200
>>>> Nathan Ward <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Through whoever you buy domestic transit from - communication for
>>>> these sorts of changes, and if required protecting customers who want to
>>>> run such a service on c2610s, is a core part of such a service. If your
>>>> transit providers are unable to do this I would suggest looking towards
>>>> other operators.
>>>>
>>>> This is a bad attitude IMO. An operator turns up in NZ, breaks a bunch
>>>> of stuff, doesn't even bother to post to NZNOG letting us know they're
>>>> going to break things, and you're just blaming my transit provider?
>>>>
>>>> Also, none of the IXes posted on NZNOG?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Michael
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NZNOG mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Kind Regards
>>>
>>>
>>> Liam Farr
>>>
>>> Maxum Data
>>> +64-9-950-5302
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NZNOG mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NZNOG mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NZNOG mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NZNOG mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
>
>

_______________________________________________
NZNOG mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog