Re: 2019 BGP router recommendations

--===============0820304229==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003b6b4f058fa34fce"

--0000000000003b6b4f058fa34fce
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

MX204 ;-)

On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 4:17 PM Phil Snowdon <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> Looking for some recommendations for BGP edge routers.
>
> Have used Juniper devices for years, but interested to hear what else may
> be out there.  Requirement is just to shift packets and multihome to a few
> upstream transit providers with full routing tables and several peering
> partners with more limited route table sizes.  Traffic volumes in the gigs
> to low 10's of gigs.
>
> I seem to be getting into a situation where the high end boxes to cope
> with routing table sizes are overkill in terms of features and performance
> (and price).   But match performance and there's not enough memory to run
> the BGP.
>
> Prefer a supported vendor device rather than roll your own open source
> solution.
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Phil
> _______________________________________________
> NZNOG mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog
>

--0000000000003b6b4f058fa34fce
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">MX204 ;-)</div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"=
ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 4:17 PM Phil Snowdon &lt;<=
a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>&gt; wro=
te:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px =
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"=
ltr">Hi All,<div><br></div><div>Looking for some recommendations for BGP ed=
ge routers.</div><div><br></div><div>Have used Juniper devices for years, b=
ut interested to hear what else may be out there.=C2=A0 Requirement is just=
 to shift packets and multihome to a few upstream transit providers with fu=
ll routing tables and several peering partners with more limited route tabl=
e sizes.=C2=A0 Traffic volumes in the gigs to low 10&#39;s of gigs.</div><d=
iv><br></div><div>I seem to be getting into a situation where the high end =
boxes to cope with routing table sizes are overkill in terms of features an=
d performance (and price).=C2=A0 =C2=A0But match performance and there&#39;=
s not enough memory to run the BGP.</div><div><br></div><div>Prefer a suppo=
rted vendor device rather than roll your own open source solution.</div><di=
v><br></div><div><br></div><div>Thanks</div><div><br></div><div>Phil</div><=
/div>
_______________________________________________<br>
NZNOG mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_blank">[email protected]=
ikato.ac.nz</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog" rel=3D"norefe=
rrer" target=3D"_blank">https://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog</=
a><br>
</blockquote></div>

--0000000000003b6b4f058fa34fce--

--===============0820304229==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
NZNOG mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog

--===============0820304229==--