Re: What is a regional exchange point?
[email protected] Thu, 6 Mar 2003 06:58:53 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.rep |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > > I thought the delineation was implicit, in that a "regional" > > exchange focuses on interconnection within some particular > > region > > Yes, but that's the definition of an exchange. Again, I repeat: What's > the distinction you're making which distinguishes a "regional exchange" > from an exchange generally? > > -Bill yes, that was the same question I asked. And perhaps Jerri (or Netlabs) provided a clue. Its not technical, it social. Regional exchanges tend to support interconnection between sites that have distinctly different peering/transit requirements than "National/International" exchanges. In one case, you have a predominance of parties that will only peer if you have OC768 interconnects at 15 locations, 7 of which must be on different continents. In the other case, you have a predominance of parties that will peer with anyone who touchs the switch fabric. This is not an attribute of the exchange per se, but of the parties at the exchange. And its not just being promiscious. Defining and controlling routing for "regional" work can be as complex as the routing design for a transnational. --bill