Re: What is a regional exchange point?
"NetLabs" <[email protected]> Thu, 6 Mar 2003 09:31:38 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.rep |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <012701c2e3f5$7c039f20$6401a8c0@home> |
Correction ---- NOT >>>> REPs ( as defined by Tier 2 markets ) are social and economic peering points ! Applications being the primary driver BUT >>>> REPs ( as they are emerging in Tier 2 markets ) are social and economic peering points ! Applications being the primary driver D. Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 8:58 AM Subject: Re: [REPforum] What is a regional exchange point? > > > > > I thought the delineation was implicit, in that a "regional" > > > exchange focuses on interconnection within some particular > > > region > > > > Yes, but that's the definition of an exchange. Again, I repeat: What's > > the distinction you're making which distinguishes a "regional exchange" > > from an exchange generally? > > > > -Bill > > yes, that was the same question I asked. And perhaps Jerri > (or Netlabs) provided a clue. Its not technical, it social. > Regional exchanges tend to support interconnection between > sites that have distinctly different peering/transit requirements > than "National/International" exchanges. > > In one case, you have a predominance of parties that will only > peer if you have OC768 interconnects at 15 locations, 7 of which > must be on different continents. In the other case, you have a > predominance of parties that will peer with anyone who touchs > the switch fabric. > > This is not an attribute of the exchange per se, but of the parties > at the exchange. And its not just being promiscious. Defining > and controlling routing for "regional" work can be as complex as > the routing design for a transnational. > > --bill > > >