Building communities around (regional) exchanges
Pete Kruckenberg <[email protected]> Fri, 21 Mar 2003 14:45:14 -0700 (MST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.rep |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I've been thinking recently about how to engage people and organizations in the community (used generically) that supports and uses an exchange. This was sparked by reading Isenberg's "Paradox of the Best Network", and a comment he makes that networks are inherently communal because they are driven by the basic human need to communicate (remember, technology is the means to an end). Exchanges are the mechanism that supports that communication in a multi-network environment. They are a focal point where network interests converge. Because they connect networks together, their participants have a vested interest in collaborating. The community surrounding an exchange is one of, if not the most valuable network community. An exchange lives or dies based on it's ability to engage and support a community, and adapt to meet the community's evolving needs. What have you found successful in building and engaging a community for your exchange? What is the community you are trying to engage? How do you engage new communities as your exchange evolves and expands, without alienating the existing exchange community? Along these lines, I have been thinking about one way to build a focus around the Utah Community Internet Exchange. I wanted to see if anyone else has tried this, or something similar. Most importantly, I'd like feedback on this idea, and would like to discuss trying this in many areas this year. I'm planning a conference for this fall called "Utah Next Generation Networks" (I've attended *the* NGN in Boston twice now, and I haven't come up with a better name yet). The conference will be a one-day event, bringing together Utah-area network users, carriers, vendors, municipalities, government, economic development, visionaries, pundits, etc. The conference will be an exchange of ideas of what people are doing with the network and what they plan to do within the next 1-3 years, specific to Utah. The exchange fits in well with this, but there will be plenty of other topics, to attract a wide array of interests that are related to the network. I hope that the conference will spawn an environment of collaboration to make a better network in our region. We start with information- and idea-sharing, and see where it goes from there. Thoughts? Pete.