Re: Re: St. Louis REP Forum Meeting ???
Christian Nielsen <[email protected]> Sun, 23 Mar 2003 08:24:58 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.operators.rep |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
With Nanog coming up in June, it would be good to have a REP forum meeting at the same time. How long does it need to be? 1 day? 1/2 day? Christian On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, NetLabs wrote: > Pete ..... > > > What is the date for the fall NANOG ?? > > If we had the fall NANOG in St. Louis then we could > do the "enhanced " REP Forum meeting here too. > > Regards.... > > Dave > > www.stlrepstudy.org > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Pete Kruckenberg" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 3:26 PM > Subject: [REPforum] Re: St. Louis REP Forum Meeting ??? > > > > This is really great, Dave. Thanks for offering to host a > > REPforum meeting. > > > > There are a few people interested in meeting at or after > > NANOG in June, because they are already planning to attend > > NANOG. > > > > Would St. Louis be a better place to meet instead of NANOG, > > or might St. Louis be a good place to meet sometime after > > June? Maybe St. Louis could host the fall NANOG, and we > > could combine REPforum with that ;) > > > > Do REP operators have budget to allocate to attending > > REPforum meetings? > > > > Pete. > > > > On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, NetLabs wrote: > > > > > We had a major planning meeting last night for the STL > > > REP project. As you already know, the STL project has > > > several components technology, relevant relationships ( > > > enterprise, government and University ) and a business > > > model to attract public connection. With the > > > relationship and business model being by far the most > > > important component to the success of the STL REP. > > > > > > To cut a long story short, we would like to offer St. > > > Louis as a site for a REP Forum meeting. > > > > > > We feel that all the normal REP Forum functions could be > > > preformed in St. Louis ( I think ) BUT we could offer > > > something that would not be available elsewhere. We > > > could include a forum panel discussion including > > > government, enterprises and Universities as a mechanism > > > to help develop the business aspects and marketing > > > strategies for REP's. > > > > > > Since we have spent the last year working with the > > > regional STL business interests the business component > > > of this REP forum panel would already be educated and > > > could provide valuable insight and relationship > > > development strategy to REP forum members. > > > > > > Regards..... > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > www.stlrepstudy.org > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Pete Kruckenberg" <[email protected]> > > > To: "Jere Retzer" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; > > > <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; > > > <[email protected]> > > > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 1:00 AM > > > Subject: NANOG presentation > > > > > > > > > > I would like to submit a proposal for a talk at the next > > > > (June) NANOG. Topic would be overview of (North American) > > > > regional exchanges, the problems they face, how they are > > > > overcoming those problems, advantages of regional/local > > > > peering, and data on cost/bandwidth savings and performance > > > > metrics. I'm looking for other areas that might be > > > > interesting to address. > > > > > > > > I would be very interested in collaborating with you (and > > > > possibly other regional exchange operators) to put this > > > > together. The first step is to assemble an abstract and > > > > submit it to Merit. I will be working on this over the next > > > > couple of weeks. > > > > > > > > I would be happy to present, but wouldn't mind if someone > > > > else were more inclined to present. I think this should be > > > > presented on behalf of the REPforum with credit to the REPs > > > > who contribute to the presentation (and a cookie for the > > > > presenter). > > > > > > > > I'd also like to consider doing a regional peering BOF, as a > > > > follow-up to the talk (and where we'd give the talk if it > > > > doesn't get approved for the agenda). This might be a great > > > > opportunity to engage the NANOG community in a discussion. > > > > > > > > Let me know if you're interested in working with me on this. > > > > > > > > Pete. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >