Re: [Proposal] What is Chandler supposed to do anyway?
Philippe Bossut <[email protected]> Wed, 05 Dec 2007 23:58:46 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.osaf.design |
|---|---|
| Organization | OSAF |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I'm OK with making the UI more self evident but the point with email is that it is the only universal interface/protocol users understand and are used to: people email stuff to their coworker next door (instead of sharing a network folder), people even email stuff to themselves! So burying email more might confuse people more. That being said, on the proposal: Mimi Yin wrote: > *1a. Remove the Reply, Reply All, Forward buttons from the Toolbar*; and > *1b. Add a Reply/Forward menu item to the Item menu* I think the correct solution is to put Send/Update/Reply/Reply All/Forward in the Detail View itself (certainly, smaller buttons, may be using a drop down for the various reply/forward options. > *2. Remove the the 'New' button from the Toolbar* and really focus on > the quick item entry bar as *the* way to create new items in Chandler. Yes, this is really useless and a waste of real estate IMO. > *3. Rename the Mail application area Messages* so that it's more of a > 'Message Center', a place where you can see the messages you > sent/received from Chandler (not un-like Inboxes for social networking > sites like Facebook or Linked In), and less of a *"Mail Application".* I'm neutral here. It makes sense in light of bug 11030 (Making sending an email explicit). Cheers, - Philippe _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design