Re: [Chandler-dev] Consolidating IRC channels

So what do we use now other than #chandler, #cosmo and #osaf-staff? I  
guess we could officially get rid of the internal staff channel  
although we haven't been using it at all really. Does everybody still  
think we should keep both #chandler and #cosmo?

On Sep 12, 2008, at 3:56 PM, Grant Baillie wrote:

> Having more than one channel per staff member might indicate hubris  
> to some people :D. I'd be up for way fewer channels, though maybe we  
> should keep #cosmo around.
>
> --Grant
>
> On 12 Sep, 2008, at 15:14, Sheila Mooney wrote:
>
>> So, I was wondering how people felt about still keeping all the IRC  
>> channels we have? Most of the traffic has been on the Chandler  
>> channel, even some server related stuff and most interop  
>> discussions. We also still have the OSAF-staff internal channel  
>> that is rarely used. I was going to throw out the suggestions of  
>> moving to a single Chandler channel for all discussions.
>>
>> What do people think?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Sheila
>> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>>
>> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
>> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
>
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev