Re: OSAF redirect
Katie Capps Parlante <capps-6zGkXsw2EZWGJGYlWa3Ukdi2O/[email protected]> Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:53:33 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.osaf.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ted Leung wrote: > On Oct 19, 2007, at 12:42 PM, Mikeal Rogers wrote: >> Also, do we have any idea why these bloggers are linking to >> osafoundation.org instead of chandlerproject.org? Are we not pushing >> this link in the product and in the marketing enough? > > Google "chandler". What link comes up at the top? If you didn't know > we changed the project url, would you look any further? As an example, Mimi and I mentioned "chandlerproject.org" several times to Scoble, but he used "www.osafoundation.org" anyway -- probably because he Googled for "chandler". That said, I'm currently thinking that the redirect is a bad idea. Having *no* OSAF link as a top search result for "chandler" is worse than the current state of affairs. Perhaps our efforts should be around: - improving the page rank of chandlerproject.org (which means getting more people to link to it) - making sure link to chandlerproject.org is very clear from osafoundation.org. Heikki recommended putting logo right next to "Looking for Chandler?" link, for example. Cheers, Katie _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general