Re: OSAF redirect
Mikeal Rogers <mikeal-6zGkXsw2EZWGJGYlWa3Ukdi2O/[email protected]> Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:55:47 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.osaf.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>> Are we certain that this number won't decrease significantly once >> we lose the current osafoundation.org page rank? Maybe the reason >> we have so many more osafoundation.org hits is because the page >> rank is high, forwarding it won't help us if that is the case. >> >> It's much riskier in my opinion to do the forward. We can redesign >> the page to make it more obvious how to get to Chandler and cut >> down the risk significantly. >> >> Also, do we have any idea why these bloggers are linking to >> osafoundation.org instead of chandlerproject.org? Are we not >> pushing this link in the product and in the marketing enough? > > Google "chandler". What link comes up at the top? If you didn't > know we changed the project url, would you look any further? We can change the page title to something like "OSAF -- Home of Chandler Project". And make half of the osafoundation.org page a large image link to chandlerproject -- something nice looking like the one on mozilla.org. If people don't click on the link then I really doubt they would have clicked on the link to visit hub or downloaded Chandler Desktop so we didn't actually lose any users and we keep our page rank. All of these people who aren't going from osafoundation.org to chandlerproject.org, are they deciding they don't want to check out the product for some reason? Did they click on the link in the blog just to check out organzation/product but not download it ( I do this all the time by the way )? The redirect doesn't help us get them as users and does drop our page rank. -Mikeal _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general