Re: Re: Portal taxonomy
Ted Leung <twl-6zGkXsw2EZWGJGYlWa3Ukdi2O/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.osaf.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Apr 10, 2006, at 12:03 PM, Alec Flett wrote: > My seven cents: I am working on a whole end user slice on all of this. If you have thoughts on what should be there, go for it. > Regarding The "Sidebar" PDF - I'm sure Newbies is supposed to be > replaced with something less colloquial, but is this "Newbies" > meaning new developers or new users? Are we planning on user and/or > sysadmin docs? i.e. how to deploy, how to share, etc? > Regarding subsections.. here's my take on Chander front-end, here's > a first stab: > Chandler UI > CPIA - some very general CPIA concepts - i.e. how blocks and > widgets relate, how we use wxWidgets, etc - leaving out > BranchPointBlock for now: > Blocks and Widgets > Events > Using wxPython APIs > Advanced CPIA > AttributeEditors > BranchPointBlock > The Chandler View (i.e. the root CPIA block) > The Sidebar > KindFilter buttons and views > The Calendar View > The Detail View > The MiniCalendar and Preview Areas > Scripting > Testing: Functional Tests > I'm probably leaving some stuff out here, but its a decent first > cut I think... > > It saddens me a bit that the developer documentation makes up such > a tiny part of Ted's graph, but that's probably only a reflection > of how we developers need to be giving him more feedback...:) Well, the graph was not totally done. Also, I was trying to think of categories as opposed to specifics, but I kind of mixed that up in my diagram. In the end I decided that it was hard to come up with categories, which was why I started putting specific content into it. But yes, we need a lot more feedback (and forethought) about what real developer documentation would look like. Ted > > Alec > > Ted Leung wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> I know that people aren't always able to get to messages in >> general@, so I'm sending this request directly as well. I just >> posted a note with the current status of the portal project >> <http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/general/2006-April/ >> 000219.html>. We could use some help from domain experts on >> parts of the taxonomy for the portal. It would help a lot if you >> could take some time to look at what's there and give us some idea >> of what categories you think would be relevant to your team and/or >> projects. Dont' feel that you need to make diagrams or >> whatever. A reply to general with your thoughts would be great -- >> we'll take care of trying to sort it out. >> >> You're getting this message because either a) you work in an area >> that's been hard for us to flesh out or b) I have the impression >> that you really care about what's up with the portal/website/ >> wiki. I know that folks are busy right now, so if you feel that >> you don't have the time, please let me know so (no pressure >> intended). >> >> Thanks, >> >> Ted >> >> ---- >> Ted Leung Open Source Applications Foundation (OSAF) >> >> >> > > > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > > Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list > http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general ---- Ted Leung Open Source Applications Foundation (OSAF) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general