Re: Portal taxonomy

My seven cents:

    * Regarding The "Sidebar" PDF - I'm sure Newbies is supposed to be
      replaced with something less colloquial, but is this "Newbies"
      meaning new developers or new users? Are we planning on user
      and/or sysadmin docs? i.e. how to deploy, how to share, etc?
    * Regarding subsections.. here's my take on Chander front-end,
      here's a first stab:
          o Chandler UI
                + CPIA - some very general CPIA concepts - i.e. how
                  blocks and widgets relate, how we use wxWidgets, etc -
                  leaving out BranchPointBlock for now:
                      # Blocks and Widgets
                      # Events
                      # Using wxPython APIs
                + Advanced CPIA
                      # AttributeEditors
                      # BranchPointBlock
                + The Chandler View (i.e. the root CPIA block)
                      # The Sidebar
                      # KindFilter buttons and views
                      # The Calendar View
                      # The Detail View
                      # The MiniCalendar and Preview Areas
                + Scripting
                + Testing: Functional Tests

I'm probably leaving some stuff out here, but its a decent first cut I 
think...

It saddens me a bit that the developer documentation makes up such a 
tiny part of Ted's graph, but that's probably only a reflection of how 
we developers need to be giving him more feedback...:)

Alec

Ted Leung wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I know that people aren't always able to get to messages in general@, 
> so I'm sending this request directly as well.   I just posted a note 
> with the current status of the portal project 
> <http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/general/2006-April/000219.html>.  
>  We could use some help from domain experts on parts of the taxonomy 
> for the portal.   It would help a lot if you could take some time to 
> look at what's there and give us some idea of what categories you 
> think would be relevant to your team and/or projects.   Dont' feel 
> that you need to make diagrams or whatever.  A reply to general with 
> your thoughts would be great -- we'll take care of trying to sort it 
> out.   
>
> You're getting this message because either a) you work in an area 
> that's been hard for us to flesh out or b) I have the impression that 
> you really care about what's up with the portal/website/wiki.  I know 
> that folks are busy right now, so if you feel that you don't have the 
> time, please let me know so (no pressure intended).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ted
>
> ----
> Ted Leung                 Open Source Applications Foundation (OSAF)
>
>
>

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general