Re: Re: [Chandler-dev] Milestone and general naming, terminology

At 05:07 PM 8/29/2006 -0700, Ted Leung wrote:
>On Aug 29, 2006, at 4:49 PM, Katie Capps Parlante wrote:
>
>>Hmmm. Ok, so Ted has been making this same argument.
>>
>>The term is less important to me than the concept. Of the terms you
>>suggested Phillip, "Preview" sounds most appealing.
>>
>>Thoughts?
>
>If we have to have a label, then I would be fine with Preview, but
>I'm not convinced that we need to attach the label directly to the
>release.   We can talk about a Preview release in announcements and
>blog posts, but that's different from having artifacts labeled
>something like  Chandler_iosx_0.7Preview.dmg.

Right, I should've been more explicit that this is what I meant.  "Preview" 
and the like would be *marketing* labels, not technical ones.  The version 
number used on development artifacts should be just plain old "0.7" for the 
final release of 0.7.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general