Re: Re: [Chandler-dev] Milestone and general naming, terminology
Priscilla Chung <priscilla-6zGkXsw2EZWGJGYlWa3Ukdi2O/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.osaf.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
+1 to basic numbering schemes! (As a less-technical person, I have had difficulty understanding what all the labeling means.) -Priscilla On Aug 29, 2006, at 5:48 PM, Mike Taylor wrote: > As a build/release person I can't tell you how hard/horrible/sad > (pick any one of them) it is to deal with projects that use more > than the basic 0.7.1 numbering scheme. > > As Phillip points out, the marketing label can be anything. I feel > strongly that we should get back to basic numbering. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general