Re: Re: [Chandler-dev] Milestone and general naming, terminology

Priscilla Chung <priscilla-6zGkXsw2EZWGJGYlWa3Ukdi2O/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.org.osaf.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
+1 to basic numbering schemes! (As a less-technical person, I have  
had difficulty understanding what all the labeling means.) -Priscilla

On Aug 29, 2006, at 5:48 PM, Mike Taylor wrote:

> As a build/release person I can't tell you how hard/horrible/sad  
> (pick any one of them) it is to deal with projects that use more  
> than the basic 0.7.1 numbering scheme.
>
> As Phillip points out, the marketing label can be anything.  I feel  
> strongly that we should get back to basic numbering.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.